The contractual reason

Every client agreement we have signed to date was signed without a publication clause. Several of those clients are in fintech and security, where being seen to use an outside agency is itself commercially sensitive.

That means we cannot publish their performance data – not named, not anonymised, not aggregated. Not "a leading European SaaS company", which is a name with a blanket over it and identifies the client to anyone who looks at the portfolio page alongside it.

The reason we are not inventing any

Case studies with verifiable results are the strongest trust signal in this market – in Fractl's July 2026 survey of 343 US marketing decision-makers, 34% named them first, ahead of methodology at 22% and team expertise at 15%.

The same survey found the top red flag was buzzwords without explanation. A round percentage with no methodology, no timeframe and no named source belongs in that category. It would also collapse on the first call, when someone asks which account it was and over what period.

When this page fills up

Every agreement we sign from 2026 onward includes the right to publish anonymised performance figures. The first clients under those terms started this year, which means the first real case study lands in 2027 – with the account described by industry and market, the timeframe stated, and the methodology written out.

Until then this page stays honest and empty rather than dishonest and full.

Or get the audit and judge us on that.

It is the closest thing to a case study we can offer: our actual analysis, on your actual account, before you pay anything.